I read your earlier post and clearly you have little idea of the role of CO's in the overall scheme of heritage protection.
Some of what you said I thought simply bizarre.
'Less us not forget that even though they have a job to do , they are at the end of the day working for and on behalf of the people.
Without our conservation attitude and money , where would these guys be. If we were to adopt a knock down and rebuilt strategy to buildings there would be no need for these people.'
They are indeed working on behalf of the people - for the greater good, not for individual owners.
I doubt that anyone would be adopting a 'knock down and rebuild' strategy.
Really you need to fight that little voice inside and accept that you are so much more than me. If I make no sense and you are so right , why do you keep on. Surely you are intelligent enough to understand that the greater good is the people.
You clearly have nothing worth saying, have not understood at all the point I was making about what actually is the greater good of the people, and you are simply wasting forum space.
That really says so much more about you than it does me - what's wrong with you? I just think you a bit of a dope, but nothing worth getting annoyed about. There are more important things in the world believe me.
I am about to e-mail the admin of this site, because clearly now you are becoming slighly unhinged. This is bordering on trolling really, and if you wish to carry out personal vendettas then this isn't the place for it.
Nemey save yourself the trouble , I have already done this on your behalf. Needless to say that verbal abuse in the form of profound language constitutes a breach of the terms of usage on this site.
As for deleting postings , once posted there is a trail left.
It's a shame , you are very informative and extremely sharp, yet you have an arrogant streak that really comes to the forefront. You really should put that to some good use.......
I have no arrogant streak whatsoever. As I said, you have never met me, and you know very little about me. What is arrogant is the fact you make assumptions about people based on a very limited viewpoint, clearly.
I doubt forum admin will care too much. In my view the person making the problems is you, not me.
Look - if you two insist on carryng on your slanging match, would you please have the courtesy to spare the rest of us, and do it via private messages?
I suggest that you read this thread, and the one about windows.
I have said what I wished to say to this person. I have no desire for any contact of any sort, certainly not through PM, and it's a very good example really of why some posters don't wish to give out too many details about themselves.
I think that's my picture. Wimpole hall gardens. Which I see Biff has now removed.
But OK, the idiot Moretyne can answer all the questions from now on, without resorting to links. I can't see why people with appropriate skills and expertise would wish to post here really. Not sure I want to any more.
I also feel hugely sorry for many CO's when I realise what they have to deal with on a day to day basis.