JoceAndChris
Member
- Messages
- 6,606
- Location
- Lincolnshire
After years of assuming this will be our solution to lack of water and amassing the funds it seems it won't be. The prognosis was most discouraging in our British Geological Survey.
I'm afraid it means BC is rather devalued if there really is no way out of drought. I will now be researching spring water harvesting, as well as the alternative, which is building a pumping station for mains connection on Beacon Lane.
The conclusion of the survey:
'The proposed borehole site is not a good one, and a successful borehole can by no means be guaranteed. A 55 m deep borehole to the base of the Marlstone Rock may provide a small supply (1-2 m3/day) of the order of magnitude required. However, as the base of the Marlstone Rock lies above river level, it could be essentially unsaturated. Also, the groundwater at these depths may be mineralised with an high iron content. If this borehole was dry, continuing it another 10-15 m into the upper part of the Charmouth Mudstone Formation may encounter some water, but is unlikely to provide a significant supply as it is probable that the Dyrham Formation will not be present below this site, with the rocks below the Marlstone Rock being mudstones.
If a borehole is attempted, further advice should also be taken regarding drilling into potentially unstable ground. Plain casing would be required against the strata above the Marlstone Rock and possibly slotted casing and a sand pack against siltstones of the Dyrham Formation, if penetrated.
According to the geological maps, the geology, and therefore the borehole potential, does not vary significantly across the site as outlined on the map supplied by the client. The chances of drilling a successful borehole are therefore similar across the site.'
I'm afraid it means BC is rather devalued if there really is no way out of drought. I will now be researching spring water harvesting, as well as the alternative, which is building a pumping station for mains connection on Beacon Lane.
The conclusion of the survey:
'The proposed borehole site is not a good one, and a successful borehole can by no means be guaranteed. A 55 m deep borehole to the base of the Marlstone Rock may provide a small supply (1-2 m3/day) of the order of magnitude required. However, as the base of the Marlstone Rock lies above river level, it could be essentially unsaturated. Also, the groundwater at these depths may be mineralised with an high iron content. If this borehole was dry, continuing it another 10-15 m into the upper part of the Charmouth Mudstone Formation may encounter some water, but is unlikely to provide a significant supply as it is probable that the Dyrham Formation will not be present below this site, with the rocks below the Marlstone Rock being mudstones.
If a borehole is attempted, further advice should also be taken regarding drilling into potentially unstable ground. Plain casing would be required against the strata above the Marlstone Rock and possibly slotted casing and a sand pack against siltstones of the Dyrham Formation, if penetrated.
According to the geological maps, the geology, and therefore the borehole potential, does not vary significantly across the site as outlined on the map supplied by the client. The chances of drilling a successful borehole are therefore similar across the site.'