Flyfisher
Member
- Messages
- 10,168
- Location
- Norfolk, UK
A daily drive through a seawater ford would have made it almost acceptable!
Apparently it's a well documented problem that occurred around 2000 and affected a couple of years of production. I've read various reasons ranging from poor quality steel, poor quality painting and the introduction of water-based paints. Those bodywork photos are bad enough but at the last MoT test I was told it would probably not pass another one without some welding work to the underside front structural components, which sealed its fate as far as I was concerned. Shame really, as it had been mechanically fine over its 170k miles and I reckon the engine was probably good for 250k miles, maybe more.
Apparently it's a well documented problem that occurred around 2000 and affected a couple of years of production. I've read various reasons ranging from poor quality steel, poor quality painting and the introduction of water-based paints. Those bodywork photos are bad enough but at the last MoT test I was told it would probably not pass another one without some welding work to the underside front structural components, which sealed its fate as far as I was concerned. Shame really, as it had been mechanically fine over its 170k miles and I reckon the engine was probably good for 250k miles, maybe more.