Lacan07
Member
- Messages
- 904
Ah yes, my bad! I assumed we were talking masonry. It's been a long day!Timber moisture meters are fine for timber, not so much for sticking into plastered walls
Ah yes, my bad! I assumed we were talking masonry. It's been a long day!Timber moisture meters are fine for timber, not so much for sticking into plastered walls
No moisture meter will be perfectly calibrated for any single piece of wood, but a series of tests over weeks/months will categorically show you if it's getting wetter or dryer.
I guess the same should apply for plaster or masonry - it's just the single spot test from a 'damp-proofing professional' that's discre
Well, over the last few days I have been monitoring things-always monitoring and losing the will to live-. The joist I showed in the pic sometimes gets almost totally dry and then attracts the damp in the same patterns if there is more moisture in the air. I really am trying to control humidity and I find the Thermo Pro hydrometer good for this. Have not used moisture meter yet-although they have been used by any 'expert' who's been. BUT, I decided to put a piece of newspaper amongst the rubbly lower hearth for a few days and have just looked at it and it is wet, not soaking, but wet. This suggests the constructional hearth is wet somewhere. This is why I thought I needed to investigate properly by having it dug and restructured as one surveyor said. I do think like you-if it ain't broke don't fix etc, but if I get the floor all sorted and coverings put down etc-wouldn't be months yet! and then have issues I'll never forgive myself. It could be because the water from my neighbour's leak has penetrated it and it hasn't dried properly yet but it could take forever!!Monica,
If you are convinced the room is not getting wetter there is no good reason to consider removing your fire surround. The hearth will dry out on its own without any interference or intercession from anyone - if it aint broke dont fix it. The humidity changes you are seeing are likely a direct result of heating and ventilation indoors and is precisely the right think and exactly what you need. As far as measures of timber dryness is concerned anything below 20% is good. Based on what I can see there is no need for new joists or re-construction of your hearth and therefore no reason to think about damp proofing these.
Cheers,
Steve
Hi Steve,Hi Monica,
What can you tell us about how the hearth is constructed? Is it a solid mass or constructed of bricks and mortar?
May be an idea to clear away all the loose debris lying on the surface and then lay a newspaper, all of it, down to repeat your test. Newspaper is so porous it will attract moisture very quickly and if the hearth is very wet the rear pages should be soaking within a few hours at most.
Cheers,
Steve
Hi Steve, Thanks for this, but the thing is if I put my hand in any gap amongst the rubbly underpart there is slight damp-eg I can manage this in a gap shown in the second pic. Also I think I can remember there were red tiles under that fire surround before it was installed-possibly part of the original fireplace that must have been there long before my time. I don't think they were taken up and they are porous aren't they? Those joists still dampen up when humidity is high as in last few days which I worry about but will eventually have them replaced I think- treated ones won't have this problem I feel.Hi Monica,
Well, that's good news at last as it seems that your damp problem has been solved and you should now be able to put the floor back to rights without tearing out the fireplace. It is not unusual to find that hearths are constructed of building waste and mortar, any scrapped bricks and other non combustible detritus would be chucked in there to allow the use of an open fire. There are several possibilities concerning the thin black layer of material under the decorative fire surround but its most likely a self-levelling floor compound that was installed before the more modern fireplace/surround was installed. You will need to think through how you intend to proceed after re-fitting the floorboards. Let us know if you have any concerns regarding how to proceed.
Cheeres,
Steve
Hi Steve,Hi Monica,
Your hearth was undoubtedly built directly over the earth and has no damp course per se. Consequently it will continue to absorb moisture from the ground and, while much of the excess water absorbed from the leaks you have had has now evaporated off it will never be genuinely bone dry. This is entirely natural and to be expected with older houses and is managed through the use of breathable materials in ints original construction and future maintenance. Given the various proofs of your success in remedying the leaks and driving out excess moisture I think that it is safe to start getting the house back in order and re-laying the floors.
Theres no need to worry about any old tiles that may have been left in the hearth. They will behave just like any other building waste in its structure and will do no harm. You need not be concerned by the timbers feeling a little damp at times, the wood is much more porous than other materials and will leach moisture from the atmosphere whenever humidity in the room is high. This too is part of the natural breathing of the building and can be considered a healthy sign.
Regarding your new concerns. Some photos may be helpful understanding what may now be going on.
Cheers,
Steve
Are you talking about the ground / earth beneath your suspended floor? And when you say wet, how wet? Its not uncommon for the ground to get damp, especially after extended periods of rain fall.But....I have noticed another issue now which you may have some thoughts on. Now that I have become obsessed with damp!!!! I lifted up a few more boards on the opposite side of the room , window side. Now I had that wall stripped back and re rendered and plastered October 2021 and had a french drain installed outside . When I lifted the boards in one corner I noticed wet on the underfloor surface. I think it's rainwater seeping in somehow. I amateurishly attempted to dry it out with a hairdryer only for an hour though-and it definitely started to dry, but got wet again when the rains came yesterday. I am now wondering if the builders who installed the drain did a botch job. I have contacted the surveyor who recommended the work but doubt if he'll get back to me. There is no issue I can see outside and gutters look ok, but that water is coming from somewhere. Any thoughts on this new concern? Also I want to say you've been really helpful so far-at least I feel I can discuss these issues with someone who has the knowledge. Not sure I'm ready to refit floorboards yet.
Hi, Thanks for taking the time to contribute to the conversation about my dilemmas. It's the ground/ earth-what the property is built on. There's no earth there, just ground. The corner is I'd say wet. It's not pouring in-we had loads of rain last night and this morning-but nevertheless seeping in. I have a small extension next to that part of the french drain and am wondering if it's under that where the problem is. God knows how I'll fix that.Are you talking about the ground / earth beneath your suspended floor? And when you say wet, how wet? Its not uncommon for the ground to get damp, especially after extended periods of rain fall.
Well Steve, you have been loads of help so far. Please don't give up on me. Having looked at some of the issues some of the other contributors are having , mine all seems pretty small fry!!! But...I'm a bit of a slow and steady person and trying not to lose my grip. I would like to know what the 'drastic' measures you would have taken are though. Regarding the joists- they are solid. I pressed a screwdriver to them the other day and it wouldn't go through, so maybe a treatment would be enough. They are bone dry in places-the damp parts form a pattern. The only reason I thought it best to replace rather than treat was because I thought new treated wood would resolve the intermittant damp issue completely whatever the humidity.Hi Monica,
Sorry for confusing you, 'fall' refers to the slope needed in a drain/pipe to ensure that water flows in the right direction toward an exit or soak-away. Given the mass of that hearth, and added to the fact that its set directly on the earth below, it could take years to thoroughly dry out. Particularly if the local water table is high or during/after long periods of heavy rain. Frankly its a tough call to make as to whether the hearth and fireplace should be completely removed and to some extent it must be based on what makes you feel most comfortable. Should you decide to do so, it may be possible to remove the fireplace without damaging it and re-install it later should you choose to keep it.
Bluntly, I'm impressed by your patience, mine would have been exhausted long ago and I would probably have taken drastic measures sooner - but then I'm not known for my forbearance. Don't be too quick to replace the joists though if they are showing good signs of drying out and there's no softness or collapse of the fibres present. A good woodworm killer/inhibitor treatment may be all that's needed.
Sorry I can't be of more help than this.
Cheers,
Steve
Hi Steve, I am so pleased you have replied. For a while there I thought you said all you could say and had enough! This mail gives me plenty to think about and act on. Just a quickie for the moment. I told you I contacted the original surveyor who recommended the french drain. When I told him that underneath all the shingle there was clay and water was not pooling at the bottom, he suggested this: 'an impervious material such as flat Slate roof tiles can be fixed to the surface walls and again the channel back-filled to support them which will certainly stop water migration through the wall'. What do you make of this? And by the way, there isn't an exit point except the clay underneath the shingle. MonicaHello Monica,
No I won't give up. Retreat is not a word found in my personal lexicon and certainly not an aspect of my behaviours. However, I do come from a family of engineers and bargees from whom the guidance was always 'If at first you don't succeed, hit with a hammer!' The use of such blunt instruments to vent my frustrations typically results in lots of wreckage, a bruised ego and likely broken thumbs (yes, both and I'm not ambidextrous before you ask). In truth I had not considered what 'drastic' action I would take in the circumstance so suffice it to say merely that little may be recognisable after I'd finished. Setting all that aside: -
Cheers for now,
- The French Drain
- A gravel filled trench can work as an excellent drain provided the water has a route to an exit from the site. As a rule the bottom of the trench will be sloped (given a fall) toward that point of exit if it is at all possible. However, the exit point Must be lower than the bottom of the trench for it to have any chance of working effectively. It may pay you to take a look if you can at where the French drain is intended to empty out to see if the outlet, such as it may be, is lower than the highest part of the trench. If it is not then water is simply sitting in the bottom of the trench and is likely soaking through the walls of the house.
- The Joists
- It could be that the stains you're seeing are just the residue left behind when the wood was soaked. If you have a moisture metre you can take readings over a period of time to establish how wet they may be in areas of concern and whether there is a positive trend to confirm that they are drying out properly. A cheap moisture metre would cost about a tenner.
- To test whether the wood has decayed due persistent wet/damp a good test is to try to press a sharp instrument, not a screw-driver, like the needle of a school compass or meat skewer into a few spots in the ares of concern. If the wood is sound you should not be able to push there point in more than a couple of millimetres - unless you're a body-builder.
- Assuming the timber is dry to the touch then it can, and should, be treated with an anti-woodworm/wood preservative, to prevent future infestation.
- The Fireplace
- Everything depends on what you decide to do regarding the damp in/around the hearth. However, it may be possible to save it should the old hearth finally be removed. How to do that can be left until you decide what the best overall approach may be.
- The Hearth Void and Observed Wetness
- Depending on how severe the original leaks next door were and how long it was before they were discovered and repaired a huge amount of water may have been absorbed into the hearth and the ground below. The only escape routes for that water will have been either by spreading out through the earth to the outer walls or through evaporation through the atmosphere of the room concerned. Given where we are in the year, how wet the weather has been and the possibility that water trapped against the exterior walls may be finding its way indoors, then what you are finding in the void may simply be the result of that new water finding its way along lines of least resistance.
- Its something to keep an eye on but unless you can find a specific source of water entering this void its likely that it will be something that will cure itself when the hearth and the ground below it throughly dry out.
- Dry Carpet and Wet Paper
- As its possible that the underside of the underlay and/or the carpet may have been impermeable to water its entirely feasible that the paper got wet from contact with the floor-boards.
- Falls of Soot
- Are common at this time of year and if you have not already done so and intend to have open fires or woodturners say then I would urge you to get the chimney swept at least once a year.
- Oftentimes such falls are the result of soot trapped in the chimney getting wet and becoming too heavy to maintain its grip on the walls of the chimney. Thats normal and its unlikely to be the source of the damp you are observing below.
- Peter Ward
- He's an excellent bloke and his advice is always valuable. £1000 for an initial consultation that may lead to either peace of mind or a much bigger bill but only you can judge if that would be a good investment.
Steve
Hi Steve,Hi Monica,
In my opinion, others may differ, a slate barrrier would merely slow the rate at which water is absorbed through the brick-work. Far better in my view to ensure that water is not allowed to accumulate in the shingle drain next to the house. The best way to achieve this is to ensure that there is a route to either lower ground away from the house or better still to a suitable waste water drain. However, if it is not viable to establish such a route then a slate barrier may reduce the water penetration to an acceptable level.
Cheers,
Steve