Flyfisher
Member
- Messages
- 10,168
- Location
- Norfolk, UK
plasticpigeon said:In a period property, I think the most important thing is to make sure as little of the original fabiric is altered as possible . . .
I entirely agree, which is why we put our new kitchen in a new extension, so as not to alter any of the original fabric of the house. Incidentally, the previous kitchen (which was not the original one anyway) remains more or less as it was, although we now mainly use it as a laundry room - so still a utilitarian room as it was previously.
Perhaps I'm being too pedantic about what constitutes an 'historic style'? Perhaps a mix of new and old is the 21st century 'style'? But I stick to my basic point that few people (if any) honestly wish to live a truly authentic 'period' lifestyle. They might like to have a fireplace and a bread oven in their kitchen as a talking point and reminder of times past, but they certainly don't want to be reliant on them for their daily needs. The 'good old days' weren't really all that good were they?
plasticpigeon said:. . . but if one needs extra cupboards, why not have them made with panel doors and beaded edging to the carcasses for example (something I wish I had done) and use period sensitive colours, or have a scrub top table, even if it isn't used for preparing food.
Why not indeed? As we've agreed, it's just a matter of personal choice. All I've asked is what sort of 'historic style' do you think such 'designer' touches create when the space is also filled with modern technology on which the home owner depends for their modern lifestyle? It's certainly not historically authentic, so how should we describe it?