Gervase
Member
- Messages
- 1,500
- Location
- North London
Don't be downhearted (and don't be tempted to follow the National Trust's example - they have a lousy record when it comes to the sensitive treatment of period buildings).
Knowing where to draw the line is perhaps the most difficult part of owning an old house.
Perhaps the only thought to bear in mind is the old conservation maxim - don't do anything that can't be undone at a future date.
Thus, if time, an impatient spouse and children with consumption compel you to take a fast-track approach to the house, make sure it's a track that someone - maybe you - can reverse back down in the future.
It's been standing for 200 years; you'd have to do something pretty drastic to b*gger the place completely, and you clearly want to do a "proper job". Reality says the eventual approach will lie somewhere in between, but leaning much more towards the latter than the former.
At least your house is owned by someone who is asking the pertinent questions and trying to find out what to do for the best - which is a better position than countless thousands of others.
Knowing where to draw the line is perhaps the most difficult part of owning an old house.
Perhaps the only thought to bear in mind is the old conservation maxim - don't do anything that can't be undone at a future date.
Thus, if time, an impatient spouse and children with consumption compel you to take a fast-track approach to the house, make sure it's a track that someone - maybe you - can reverse back down in the future.
It's been standing for 200 years; you'd have to do something pretty drastic to b*gger the place completely, and you clearly want to do a "proper job". Reality says the eventual approach will lie somewhere in between, but leaning much more towards the latter than the former.
At least your house is owned by someone who is asking the pertinent questions and trying to find out what to do for the best - which is a better position than countless thousands of others.