MatthewC
Member
- Messages
- 1,733
- Location
- Central/South England
I found that the best thing to do is to decide for yourself what is a "like for like" repair and then never to mention it to the CO. Anything that was mentioned to them seemed to attract interest and, in a couple of cases, stupid conditions. One was the front door, brand new, specially made to be identical in every respect, which the architect included in an application; the CO wanted me to re-use all of the door furniture, even though she had never seen it - none of it was remotely original. :roll: I did re-use the doctor's knocker but changed the rest. Another condition was that something had to be completed "before the house was first occupied" - it's only 150+years old!LucyLokitt1750 said:...
Gareth Hughes said:If we're talking about treating one beam for a past insect infestation and possibly doing some minor work to strengthen it, then unless you are buying a mediaeval hall house with an astonishingly decorative roof, then I'd say that doesn't need LBC - it's a repair, not an alteration.
Well, it definitely isn't that exciting! However, the surveyor has recommended that a large chunk of the beam needs replacing -is this classed as repair/or "like-for-like" and therefore exempt, or do you think we'll need LBC for it? We'd just assumed it would, so I'd be interested in your thoughts on that.
...
In the case of your beam, I'd just do it without LBC, but I'm not a lawyer.