parkview094
Member
- Messages
- 149
- Location
- Hersham, Surrey
I realise I'm in the wrong place for a sympathetic ear with regards to struggling for planning consent for PVCu Windows - but the procedure is baffling me here!
We live in an Article 4 protected property. The last owner took it upon themselves to replace most of the original oak windows with a horrible storm-proof PVCu affair. We've had planning approved for a modest extension and were originally hoping to re-instate the wood windows throughout and use wood in the new build.
Unfortunately, the quotes we've had for wood are proving cost prohibitive so we've been trying to find a plan b. I stumbled across the http://www.residence9.co.uk/ system, which in my mind would be a vast improvement over what we have today. I subsequently spoke to the council to find out whether we could modify our application to replace the current PVCu with these and use these in the new build. Their response has surprised me for 2 reasons:
1. I'm told that this would not be "non-material amendment" but instead would need a full planning resubmission. I'm finding the definitions of a "non-material amendment" very vague, so I suspect I'll just have to agree with the council on this.
2. I'm told that the use of PVCu would likely be rejected. I asked, as a compromise, whether we could use wood in the front to enhance the street-scene, but use the R9 system on the rear/sides away from the passing public. This got my question referred to the local Heritage officer who has said no PVCu anywhere. Not front, not back - nowhere in the conservation area. I've since found 3 planning applications for similar Article4 protected properties in our street that have had the use of PVCu approved (either in the front or rear) within the last 12 months, so called the Heritage officer for a chat. She's advised that unfortunately these other 3 applications hadn't crossed her desk, but had they done - they wouldn't have been approved.
So now we're in a dilema. People often talk about a planning president, but does this actually exist? I'm tempted to submit an application for wood in the front and PCVu elsewhere and appeal if it's rejected to see how it plays out - but I'm conscious this is just likely to get everybody off-side.. Any thoughts / suggestions? Do we just have to start saving?
M
We live in an Article 4 protected property. The last owner took it upon themselves to replace most of the original oak windows with a horrible storm-proof PVCu affair. We've had planning approved for a modest extension and were originally hoping to re-instate the wood windows throughout and use wood in the new build.
Unfortunately, the quotes we've had for wood are proving cost prohibitive so we've been trying to find a plan b. I stumbled across the http://www.residence9.co.uk/ system, which in my mind would be a vast improvement over what we have today. I subsequently spoke to the council to find out whether we could modify our application to replace the current PVCu with these and use these in the new build. Their response has surprised me for 2 reasons:
1. I'm told that this would not be "non-material amendment" but instead would need a full planning resubmission. I'm finding the definitions of a "non-material amendment" very vague, so I suspect I'll just have to agree with the council on this.
2. I'm told that the use of PVCu would likely be rejected. I asked, as a compromise, whether we could use wood in the front to enhance the street-scene, but use the R9 system on the rear/sides away from the passing public. This got my question referred to the local Heritage officer who has said no PVCu anywhere. Not front, not back - nowhere in the conservation area. I've since found 3 planning applications for similar Article4 protected properties in our street that have had the use of PVCu approved (either in the front or rear) within the last 12 months, so called the Heritage officer for a chat. She's advised that unfortunately these other 3 applications hadn't crossed her desk, but had they done - they wouldn't have been approved.
So now we're in a dilema. People often talk about a planning president, but does this actually exist? I'm tempted to submit an application for wood in the front and PCVu elsewhere and appeal if it's rejected to see how it plays out - but I'm conscious this is just likely to get everybody off-side.. Any thoughts / suggestions? Do we just have to start saving?
M