I agree with that.Nemesis said:I'd also do as Andrew suggested and get a copy of the letter he sends to mortgage companies... as a local authority Historic Buildings Officer he deals with this sort of thing regularly I'm sure...
The point about repossession etc applies to all houses. It seems to me though that in this case the sum borrowed is so far below the house valuation that, even in its 'Building at Risk' state (!!!) it would be very easy to sell on!
It would be very, very useful though if a few people did start kicking up a fuss about the whole damp proofing and timber treatment industry...
I bet those who have diagnosed the 'widespread' damp and infestation have nothing like the expertise of people such as Brian Ridout.
Also - what C and G don't seem to be appreciating is the fact that work as specified by the firm which gave the 'free' survey may require LBC, which isn't a rapid matter.
Please also do let the SPAB know about all this...
I'm sure you can answer that question yourself. You'll have read dozens of estate agents' house details that say things like "benefits from a pleasant aspect".matthew said:Just a quick question...
If the house goes back on the market, does the Estate Agent have to declare that they know there are problems with damp, timber and beetle, and that conditions have been imposed on a mortgage.
Or can they pretend it all never happened?
Penners said:I'm sure you can answer that question yourself. You'll have read dozens of estate agents' house details that say things like "benefits from a pleasant aspect".matthew said:Just a quick question...
If the house goes back on the market, does the Estate Agent have to declare that they know there are problems with damp, timber and beetle, and that conditions have been imposed on a mortgage.
Or can they pretend it all never happened?
When did you last read details that said "suffers from damp, woodworm, subsidence and smelly drains"?
Nemesis said:Yes, it's all a bit of a mess, but hang on in there and take a deep breath! It's all very stressful I know.
Ask the agent if, when the house was valued, he took into account the work which its is now revealed as needing to be done... did he mention in the particulars that some 'updating' may be required? Make the b*gger work for his money!
Nemesis said:And make a lower offer, to cover it. Frankly I doubt it's as much as the survey and the Man with a Van say is required, but...
Nemesis said:The vendors should realise that most other people will have exactly the same sort of survey etc etc... it's only prolonging the process. Either they ensure the house is sellable or they accept that it's likely they will have eaxctly the same problems with other offers.
Nemesis said:AND CONTACT SPAB!!!
Nemesis said:To add - have you asked the CO for some indication that you would be able also to convert the outbuildings to residential use?
No use buying and then finding that there are local policies in place which will prevent this...
Nemesis said:Try Norwich and Peterborough, try Coventry, (who have been very good to us...) try the Ecology..
See my post re endowments - don't give in. Go have a few glasses of wine!
Ev
PS - you said that the valuation was more than the asking price?
Nemesis said:OK - has there been a great deal of other interest?