there has been some subsidence affecting the front left hand corner. whilst externally cracks have been made good and painted over we noted that there was some fracture cracks visible internally above the front door. this indicates that there is inadequate foundation for the ground conditions. the crack needs to be monitored in case underpinning needs to be carried out.
robgil said:the plot thickens.
our survey does not give any indication as to a re-build cost , this is not something i would like to hazard a guess on.
also , in the survey it says ,
there has been some subsidence affecting the front left hand corner. whilst externally cracks have been made good and painted over we noted that there was some fracture cracks visible internally above the front door. this indicates that there is inadequate foundation for the ground conditions. the crack needs to be monitored in case underpinning needs to be carried out.
so , how do i get around this? most insurers have said they wont insure against subsidence with a report like this unless its stated as 'historic none progressive' in the survey , which it does not.
I guess it would be small beer for NFU Mutual who must frequently have much more dramatic incidents, many equally self-inflicted:Hatster said:Our claim was my husband cycling into a car and crumpling his bike, which I was amazed we could claim for!
It's always nice to read the words of a professional, giving sensitive advice on the conservation of our architectural heritage. :roll:Gareth Hughes said:as you aren't listed this time, the rebuild cost could simply be for toshing it up to look the same in breezeblock
NFU is one of the better insureres as it often sends out a surveyor before they offer cover but they sometimes find problems as you have found.
The seminar was sponsored by Payle Russell (Special Risks) ltd who are Thatch and Listed Building Specialist.