Lime
Member
- Messages
- 2,749
- Location
- East of England
Penners said:Yes, low energy lighting produces some heat, albeit less than the old incandescent lighting. But it's a moot point whether that heat is wasted (in winter, anyway).Lime said:Most people have central heated modern houses that are often very warm and the "eco" light they buy to save the world and life as we know it is warm too, heated by all the excess heat energy they waste.
As you say, most people have central heating, which is controlled by a thermostat. If the lighting is giving off heat, then it will presumably help to satisfy the thermostat just that little bit quicker. So the heat won't, in fact, be wasted.
Yes I agree but you appear to have missed my point possibly because I did not explain myself properly.
I was referring to the "eco" lamp being warm prior to switch on so that the warm up period would be very short or not exist.
Whereas those people with cold houses (not using much energy unlike the hot modern house) have cold "eco" lamps that take forever to warm up, rendering them useless in many situations.
(I have "eco" lamps in my outside lights and they take nearly 15 minutes to warm up properly on a cold night so not much good for taking out the rubbish!)
The point being that the majority of people who support the ban of the incandescent lamp are living in hot energy-consuming houses.
Also, by your own logical argument with reference to the heat difference between types of lamp, there is no major saving of energy because central heating makes up the difference.
So people in large older houses who wish to continue using incandescents are being made to change by those people who's lifestyle consumes huge quantities of energy and to whom the "eco" lamps make little or no difference.