Gareth Hughes
Member
- Messages
- 2,741
- Location
- In the wilds of East Anglia
adrianth said:A related thing I've been meaning to ask for ages:
We too have a 1910-ish cavity walled house. I read somewhere that in this era cavities were more intended to stop wind-driven rain than as insulation, and a surveyor mentioned that similar houses down the road had very chunky iron wall ties. This suggests that adding cavity wall insulation to such a house would be a bad idea, as it could provide a bridge for moisture, or at least slow the ties from drying out if they ever get wet. Is that right, or were the Edwardians just wrong about the function of the cavity, and it works (dry) just like modern ones? And does the lack of zinc coating on old ties make cavity-filling insulation a bad idea in any case?
PS. I forgot to mention: as far as I can detect, in our case there is only a damp-proof course on the inner leaf of the cavity, and it looks like some sort of tar (applied liquid, then set), definitely not slate. Don't know how unusual that is!
Cavity construction has nothing to do with insulation - its purpose, as you say, is entirely to separate the wall into two leaves, the inner one of which will not be affected by the ingress of water, while the outer one, to some extent, will always be "damp", in contrast to traditional solid-wall construction. Filling the cavity with insulating material, in theory, completely negates the intended performance of the wall construction, by bridging the cavity.