Throw them????! Wash your mouth out Mr Newell!Ah, I see... reverese photos those boards look more like 1580s, dont throw them, they can be saved, I can send photos of both similar elm, oak and pine floors I did recently. The only issue is they look like they have been tarmaced... I just hope they aren't pine because the bitumen would have dissolved the latewood rings and turned it into pinene flavoured toffee.
considering they appear to be 25% air and 25% bitumin I would say the lighting, arty as it is is (great photo) isn't that misleading to me! I have seen better 1600s boards but then if you have no replacements, that's pretty rare. I would presume oak as elm or pine would have evaporated even more with no roof.the lighting is misleading, but many have surface moisture damage
Thats a fair amount of work there, but seeing those floorboards must be worth it.Finally, shed of the 60s-80s hideousness…
View attachment 12341View attachment 12342View attachment 12343
They are oak. They’ve had some abuse. The matching ones a level down are in nice condition. Albeit all have obviously shrunk and exposed the laps.considering they appear to be 25% air and 25% bitumin I would say the lighting, arty as it is is (great photo) isn't that misleading to me! I have seen better 1600s boards but then if you have no replacements, that's pretty rare. I would presume oak as elm or pine would have evaporated even more with no roof.
Think they just made do, but there have been repairs and amendments particularly when the roof and commons were replaced 100+ years ago… the ones below are full width, where they haven’t been cut through.Maybe the shorter ones on the left are infills? the longer on the right being the top mezzanine? Easier to move bales than via a small ladderway? 14" width they would of had longer spans available, but then they might of been recycled, you never know.
Oh really? Fantastic, they can be saved, I can write you a schedule lol. Materials will be around £500 to £1,000 alone but the boards will look stunning.They are oak. They’ve had some abuse. The matching ones a level down are in nice condition. Albeit all have obviously shrunk and exposed the laps.
It’s a trick of your eyes - no bitumen here. Doesn’t appear that any treatment has ever gone on these.
Possibly, but only if they had been flipped, the faces would have been drawn smooth and or worn smooth.Am I seeing saw marks just off the perpendicular, pit saw cut? Or just my imagination.
Well... they are, a little! Just luckily not caked in tar. And congrats to gothichome, you win the eyesight prize...View attachment 12363
Except, they’re not!
Just the tip of the ice berg… all systems go now on this project. Next 6 mths we’ll break the back of it, then move back in and carry on forevermore….Thats a fair amount of work there, but seeing those floorboards must be worth it.
You are indeed. Both sides in fact. Top faces are slightly cupped, but not excessively so.Am I seeing saw marks just off the perpendicular, pit saw cut? Or just my imagination.
Nope, this is the top face, slight cupping, but not dramatic. Underside are lime washed, but still show saw marks.Well... they are, a little! Just luckily not caked in tar. And congrats to gothichome, you win the eyesight prize...
Interesting to see if they are smotth on the obverse.