BarumMike
Member
- Messages
- 6
- Location
- North Devon
We have just renovated and draught proofed a large sash window in our Victorian house. This included fitting a staff bead with a slide in brush seal to contact the inner face of the bottom rail of the lower sash. Unfortunately the underside of the bottom rail slopes downwards to the outside at around 10-11 degrees. The cill only slopes at around 3 degrees and forms a step about 6mm short of the front face of the sash. So, when the sash is closed the front edge of the sash overhangs the edge of the step of the cill (which helps prevent rain running back up the cill) but means that there is a significant gap at the inner edge of the bottom rail, so that the staff bead only overlaps the bottom of the inner face of the sash by a few mms. This in turn means that the brush seal doesn't make enough contact with the inner face of the bottom rail and cold air whistles through. Has anyone come across this design before? It seems odd that the cill and the bottom of the sash don't have the same slope. Should I build up the bottom face of the lower sash to more closely follow the three degree slope of the cill and provide more contact surface for the brush seal? Not easy to do without taking out the sash again. Perhaps easier would be to insert a ?8mm fillet under the bottom staff bead to improve contact with the brush seal.
And a related observation - there is no draught seal or parting bead at the top rail, so there is still a significant draught. When we had other sash windows refurbed by a prestigious local firm they did not provide either protection at the top rail, and I followed their example which I now regret!
And a related observation - there is no draught seal or parting bead at the top rail, so there is still a significant draught. When we had other sash windows refurbed by a prestigious local firm they did not provide either protection at the top rail, and I followed their example which I now regret!