Not sure what to do in the situation we are in.
Our house which we bought in 2008 is probably 18th century although some of the timbers have been dated as 17th century. It is not listed because there have been many alterations to it over the years leaving very little that is original.
We had a full building survey costing over £1000 at the time and there were issues such as the unsuitable render which we have since remedied but no mention of subsidence or the 'modern' side extension.
The extension consists of a conservatory and bathroom. The roof of both is polycarbonate and there is a single skin block wall dividing the two rooms with a false ceiling in the bathroom side. Not sure when it was built but probably 1970's or 80's. The previous owners did not own up to building it but they said so many things that we have since found out to be untrue we simply don't know.
We had planned to install a new bathroom and starting taking off tiles to find cracks of about quarter of an inch in the wall of the small passageway which leads into the bathroom. At this point we contacted the insurance company who said it is subsidence caused by the downpipe from the roof of the extension not going into a proper soakaway. Since the process started small cracks that were hardly noticeable have become larger including ones upstairs on the landing. The insurance company said that if we installed a rainwater barrel the subsidence would stop. We have done this and, according to their measurements, it has stopped, however the cracks everywhere are getting worse and you can now see daylight through one of the ones in the bathroom. We really don't believe that the subsidence is caused solely by the rainwater issue - if it was why has it taken since the 1970's for it to cause subsidence? Also we are unconvinced that it won't move any more. The area is one where there is a high water table, other properties in the area are affected by subsidence and newer houses have been built taking this into account.
The insurance company say that they can carry out 'repairs' but of course this would mean like for like. The existing bathroom is pretty much in need of renewal and the conservatory is fairly awful, the roof in parrticular probably has very little mileage left in it, so we really can't see the point of them doing the repairs, reinstalling the bathroom fittings etc. tiles matched up, etc. for us to still be unhappy with it and rip it all out again some time in the future. Especially if there was then further subsidence.
They say that they think there is £15,000 worth of repairs there but have yet to come up with a cash settlement figures as an alternate. Would this be £15,000?
This would not cover the cost of demolition, repair to the main wall of the house and rebuilding a new extension.
Really not sure what to do. We certainly couldn't sell the house in the mess it is in. We have already spent around £70,000 on repairs and renovations to the house and don't have any more savings. We are retired and living on pensions so not wealthy.
Our house which we bought in 2008 is probably 18th century although some of the timbers have been dated as 17th century. It is not listed because there have been many alterations to it over the years leaving very little that is original.
We had a full building survey costing over £1000 at the time and there were issues such as the unsuitable render which we have since remedied but no mention of subsidence or the 'modern' side extension.
The extension consists of a conservatory and bathroom. The roof of both is polycarbonate and there is a single skin block wall dividing the two rooms with a false ceiling in the bathroom side. Not sure when it was built but probably 1970's or 80's. The previous owners did not own up to building it but they said so many things that we have since found out to be untrue we simply don't know.
We had planned to install a new bathroom and starting taking off tiles to find cracks of about quarter of an inch in the wall of the small passageway which leads into the bathroom. At this point we contacted the insurance company who said it is subsidence caused by the downpipe from the roof of the extension not going into a proper soakaway. Since the process started small cracks that were hardly noticeable have become larger including ones upstairs on the landing. The insurance company said that if we installed a rainwater barrel the subsidence would stop. We have done this and, according to their measurements, it has stopped, however the cracks everywhere are getting worse and you can now see daylight through one of the ones in the bathroom. We really don't believe that the subsidence is caused solely by the rainwater issue - if it was why has it taken since the 1970's for it to cause subsidence? Also we are unconvinced that it won't move any more. The area is one where there is a high water table, other properties in the area are affected by subsidence and newer houses have been built taking this into account.
The insurance company say that they can carry out 'repairs' but of course this would mean like for like. The existing bathroom is pretty much in need of renewal and the conservatory is fairly awful, the roof in parrticular probably has very little mileage left in it, so we really can't see the point of them doing the repairs, reinstalling the bathroom fittings etc. tiles matched up, etc. for us to still be unhappy with it and rip it all out again some time in the future. Especially if there was then further subsidence.
They say that they think there is £15,000 worth of repairs there but have yet to come up with a cash settlement figures as an alternate. Would this be £15,000?
This would not cover the cost of demolition, repair to the main wall of the house and rebuilding a new extension.
Really not sure what to do. We certainly couldn't sell the house in the mess it is in. We have already spent around £70,000 on repairs and renovations to the house and don't have any more savings. We are retired and living on pensions so not wealthy.