A
Anonymous
Guest
Now that it has resurfaced. Clearly, the writer is not aware that in the recent issue of Property Care specific reference was made to the use of lime renders in reducing and controlling certain dampness problems, as well as non intervention in dry rot resulting in some success. Surprise surprise
these revelations were in this magazine which is published by BWPDA.
Mention was made of moisture meters; presumably conductivity moisture meters that are specifically calibrated for timber but measurements in timber can often indicate high levels of moisture. It is imperative that anyone inspecting a building determines where such moisture is coming from. Many BWPDA members in particular Rentokil use Speedy Type meters which are considered as the easiest method to determine moisture with a wall.
Unfortunately this type of meter does demand some damage to the wall being evaluated. Hence, in many instances these cannot be used as to do so would cause damage to decorations.
Some mention was made in the various letters that BWPDA qualification means that only one surveyor will be qualified. It is the intention that all members of this association will be qualified and this is well on the way. So if any member of the public approaches a BWPDA member they can be full assured that they will be qualified or working under supervision of a qualified person.
Many period property owners are becoming wise to some non interventionists who prefer not employing specialist who are fully experienced with historic buildings. It is for this reason that the BWPDA have now created Independent Surveyors and Consultants. I can remember a so called specialist examining Brighton Pavilion and without full knowledge and understanding of certain fungal problems made a recommendation to avoid treatment of any kind. Yes you have guessed it, as it nearly resulted in the historic irreplaceable ceiling being lost. It was only with the intervention of a very small but highly specialised company that the ceiling was saved. There they used preservatives and stabilizers to achieve the solution.
I only hope that a more balanced view can be expressed in discussions with so called Historic Building Specialists. I rather think that a few of the less aware can be so intransigent that they will not move from their stance for example chemicals
or cement must not be used. When the Romans built certain structures e.g. the largest dome still standing today they used techniques incorporating
cement type materials.
Rome was not built in a day and I can fully see such discussions going on and on. But as you can see there are distinct points of view and unfortunately some within so called historic circles cannot see out of the forest of confusion that has been created
I am sorry that I have not addressed the writer by name, but it would appear that they have not signed their email.
If the person represents Period Property I would be delighted in writing an article with a balanced view in restoration.
Regards
David G Buckley
these revelations were in this magazine which is published by BWPDA.
Mention was made of moisture meters; presumably conductivity moisture meters that are specifically calibrated for timber but measurements in timber can often indicate high levels of moisture. It is imperative that anyone inspecting a building determines where such moisture is coming from. Many BWPDA members in particular Rentokil use Speedy Type meters which are considered as the easiest method to determine moisture with a wall.
Unfortunately this type of meter does demand some damage to the wall being evaluated. Hence, in many instances these cannot be used as to do so would cause damage to decorations.
Some mention was made in the various letters that BWPDA qualification means that only one surveyor will be qualified. It is the intention that all members of this association will be qualified and this is well on the way. So if any member of the public approaches a BWPDA member they can be full assured that they will be qualified or working under supervision of a qualified person.
Many period property owners are becoming wise to some non interventionists who prefer not employing specialist who are fully experienced with historic buildings. It is for this reason that the BWPDA have now created Independent Surveyors and Consultants. I can remember a so called specialist examining Brighton Pavilion and without full knowledge and understanding of certain fungal problems made a recommendation to avoid treatment of any kind. Yes you have guessed it, as it nearly resulted in the historic irreplaceable ceiling being lost. It was only with the intervention of a very small but highly specialised company that the ceiling was saved. There they used preservatives and stabilizers to achieve the solution.
I only hope that a more balanced view can be expressed in discussions with so called Historic Building Specialists. I rather think that a few of the less aware can be so intransigent that they will not move from their stance for example chemicals
or cement must not be used. When the Romans built certain structures e.g. the largest dome still standing today they used techniques incorporating
cement type materials.
Rome was not built in a day and I can fully see such discussions going on and on. But as you can see there are distinct points of view and unfortunately some within so called historic circles cannot see out of the forest of confusion that has been created
I am sorry that I have not addressed the writer by name, but it would appear that they have not signed their email.
If the person represents Period Property I would be delighted in writing an article with a balanced view in restoration.
Regards
David G Buckley