Hi all,
I am struggling to figure out what to do with the flooring in our kitchen-diner renovation.
I have just discovered the original kitchen floor is quarry tiles laid directly onto earth.
Our original intention was to have LVT throughout both the kitchen and dining room, with a levelling screed on the kitchen floor butting up to ply or OSB on the suspended wooden dining room floor.
However, I understand this may not be a good idea on the basis that a liquid DPM and levelling screed would not be breathable, and could result in damp issues in the walls?
The quarry tiles are a little damp, as they were under decades old lino.
However, the tiled floor in the lean-to directly adjacent to the kitchen (which hasn't been covered up with lino) isn't damp.
See the small area of tiles through the open door.
Other point of context, the house is at the top of a hill, so we don't expect water table to be an issue.
Since I don't think the ground is likely to be excessively damp, might the risk of laying a non-permeable layer on top of it be acceptable?
I understand that best practice as far as modern standards are would be to lift the tiles, excavate down, lay sand, DPM sheets, insulation and then pour a screed.
What I don't understand, is how doing that would be any different in terms of the potential for damp getting into the walls, compared to sealing the tiles with a liquid DPM like SBT+ and then using a self levelling screed?
Both would trap moisture under the floor.
I am also considering the other option would be to retain the tiles if I can persaude my partner to accept the aesthetic, and manage to replace some damaged tiles that are laid verrrrrrrryyy tightly...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e60be/e60becff0bcc991e91a538452c4f1faba49475d6" alt="IMG_20250214_230547.jpg IMG_20250214_230547.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9332a/9332a4dbab91b2b46516a9fd28c1c2aa048eff4f" alt="IMG_20250214_181246.jpg IMG_20250214_181246.jpg"
I am struggling to figure out what to do with the flooring in our kitchen-diner renovation.
I have just discovered the original kitchen floor is quarry tiles laid directly onto earth.
Our original intention was to have LVT throughout both the kitchen and dining room, with a levelling screed on the kitchen floor butting up to ply or OSB on the suspended wooden dining room floor.
However, I understand this may not be a good idea on the basis that a liquid DPM and levelling screed would not be breathable, and could result in damp issues in the walls?
The quarry tiles are a little damp, as they were under decades old lino.
However, the tiled floor in the lean-to directly adjacent to the kitchen (which hasn't been covered up with lino) isn't damp.
See the small area of tiles through the open door.
Other point of context, the house is at the top of a hill, so we don't expect water table to be an issue.
Since I don't think the ground is likely to be excessively damp, might the risk of laying a non-permeable layer on top of it be acceptable?
I understand that best practice as far as modern standards are would be to lift the tiles, excavate down, lay sand, DPM sheets, insulation and then pour a screed.
What I don't understand, is how doing that would be any different in terms of the potential for damp getting into the walls, compared to sealing the tiles with a liquid DPM like SBT+ and then using a self levelling screed?
Both would trap moisture under the floor.
I am also considering the other option would be to retain the tiles if I can persaude my partner to accept the aesthetic, and manage to replace some damaged tiles that are laid verrrrrrrryyy tightly...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e60be/e60becff0bcc991e91a538452c4f1faba49475d6" alt="IMG_20250214_230547.jpg IMG_20250214_230547.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9332a/9332a4dbab91b2b46516a9fd28c1c2aa048eff4f" alt="IMG_20250214_181246.jpg IMG_20250214_181246.jpg"