Hi
We have a Grade ii listed lime kiln and we live in a conservation area, and would like to build a straw bale potting shed on top. This would be in way of two existing breeze block and glass structures - which are pretty hideous in their current form - the new structure would not exceed the dimensions of the current building footprints. We also have some rather dreadful glass house/breeze block structures on the side of the kiln (see photo at http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/673408 or in the attachment if I can get it to play ). On the far side of the kiln, near the boat - is another entrance to the kiln which has an ugly brick wall blocking it, which can't be seen in the photo.
My question is whether any one has found any mileage with planning in negotiating for what you want (i.e the straw bale structure) in return for improving (enhancing) the structure by removing the hideous appendages, allowing the entire kiln to be seen from the road. With its living roof and ability to blend into the background it is my belief that the new structure would enhance the kiln, particularly with the removal of the 'hideous' additions.
The new structure would not be used for living purposes, but would be treated as a summer house/potting shed - the top of the kiln is deceptively large by the way, with the current foot print of the sheds being approx 10 metres by 4m. They also would not be seen from the road as they are set well back. Or should I just do what every one else does in Cornwall which is build the thing wait for the compaint and then retrospective it - this seems to happen A LOT along this road - but that just makes me uncomfortable - but then so do inflexible planning/conservation officers...
Appreciate any experiences with such things,
Regards
Chris
We have a Grade ii listed lime kiln and we live in a conservation area, and would like to build a straw bale potting shed on top. This would be in way of two existing breeze block and glass structures - which are pretty hideous in their current form - the new structure would not exceed the dimensions of the current building footprints. We also have some rather dreadful glass house/breeze block structures on the side of the kiln (see photo at http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/673408 or in the attachment if I can get it to play ). On the far side of the kiln, near the boat - is another entrance to the kiln which has an ugly brick wall blocking it, which can't be seen in the photo.
My question is whether any one has found any mileage with planning in negotiating for what you want (i.e the straw bale structure) in return for improving (enhancing) the structure by removing the hideous appendages, allowing the entire kiln to be seen from the road. With its living roof and ability to blend into the background it is my belief that the new structure would enhance the kiln, particularly with the removal of the 'hideous' additions.
The new structure would not be used for living purposes, but would be treated as a summer house/potting shed - the top of the kiln is deceptively large by the way, with the current foot print of the sheds being approx 10 metres by 4m. They also would not be seen from the road as they are set well back. Or should I just do what every one else does in Cornwall which is build the thing wait for the compaint and then retrospective it - this seems to happen A LOT along this road - but that just makes me uncomfortable - but then so do inflexible planning/conservation officers...
Appreciate any experiences with such things,
Regards
Chris