plasticpigeon
Member
- Messages
- 2,462
- Location
- Birmingham
Sorry in advance for the long post. I want to challenge the love affair that many conservationists have with lime plaster. I've been experimenting around now in my experimenting room, and I have tried 3 different types of lime plaster on top of lime render. I have tried two types of sand, one very fine and one sold as plastering sand, so sharp, quite fine and graded with hydraulic lime, and one ready mixed lime putty that I picked up from Matthew C at the weekend (many thanks Matthew by the way!) I got a pretty good finish with the putty, and I think on my next try I could get it as smooth and flat as modern plaster. However I accidentally bashed it a couple of days after applying and made a little mark, and it is impossible to repair!!!
I understand the reason that people like lime is because it has vapour permeability and also it is not very strong. I am sold on that idea for mortar for brick and stonework and as external render. I have seen the damage cement causes to the bricks on my property, both from trapping water in bricks causing spalling on freezing (it is very visible how much longer the cement pointed bricks stay wet after a shower than the lime pointed ones) and from structural movement, so I have used Nhl 3.5 for all repairs to brickwork.
However when it comes to plaster I'm not convinced that lime is any more "breathable" than gypsum. I've tried an experiment and sprayed a load of water at a plasterboard wall with a skim of gypsum and a lime plastered wall and the gypsum wall absorbs the water more easily and dries out more quickly. This makes me think it is both more vapour permeable and more able to absorb liquids than lime plaster. I know a criticism of gypsum is that it doesn't deal with being wet very well and tends to disintegrate but I would imagine that the wetness levels seen inside a house aren't going to be enough to cause gypsum to disintegrate (cornices and other ornament were always gypsum anyway). However the two areas that gypsum really scores in is that it is tougher than lime so deals with bumps and knocks better, and also as it has no sand in it, it is much easier to patch up if it does get damaged. It seems a trend these days to paint everything with PVA before using multifinish which obviously makes a waterproof barrier, and makes the plaster easier to apply, but wetting the wall would have the same effect and get rid of the PVA barrier.
I'm not advocating board and skim, as I believe that the paper on plasterboard is also pretty impermeable to both passage of liquid and vapour which is why it is so easy to skim onto, and I don't like hollow sounding walls. Also I don't like the idea of browning as it is probably stroner than the mortar if not the bricks, and I can see getting it off if need be an impossible task and I object to making permanent alterations. However a thin gypsum skim onto a lime render sounds a perfect combination to me. Lime against the brick which is weak enough not to damage the brick and also if there is water ingress from outside should deal with it better than gypsum. Gypsum skim for strength against knocks, repairability and soaking up condensation if there is any. I haven't tried multifinish on lime, so I don't know if it sticks. I wish I had tried it in my experimenting room. Breathable paint would be a must though. What do people think?
I understand the reason that people like lime is because it has vapour permeability and also it is not very strong. I am sold on that idea for mortar for brick and stonework and as external render. I have seen the damage cement causes to the bricks on my property, both from trapping water in bricks causing spalling on freezing (it is very visible how much longer the cement pointed bricks stay wet after a shower than the lime pointed ones) and from structural movement, so I have used Nhl 3.5 for all repairs to brickwork.
However when it comes to plaster I'm not convinced that lime is any more "breathable" than gypsum. I've tried an experiment and sprayed a load of water at a plasterboard wall with a skim of gypsum and a lime plastered wall and the gypsum wall absorbs the water more easily and dries out more quickly. This makes me think it is both more vapour permeable and more able to absorb liquids than lime plaster. I know a criticism of gypsum is that it doesn't deal with being wet very well and tends to disintegrate but I would imagine that the wetness levels seen inside a house aren't going to be enough to cause gypsum to disintegrate (cornices and other ornament were always gypsum anyway). However the two areas that gypsum really scores in is that it is tougher than lime so deals with bumps and knocks better, and also as it has no sand in it, it is much easier to patch up if it does get damaged. It seems a trend these days to paint everything with PVA before using multifinish which obviously makes a waterproof barrier, and makes the plaster easier to apply, but wetting the wall would have the same effect and get rid of the PVA barrier.
I'm not advocating board and skim, as I believe that the paper on plasterboard is also pretty impermeable to both passage of liquid and vapour which is why it is so easy to skim onto, and I don't like hollow sounding walls. Also I don't like the idea of browning as it is probably stroner than the mortar if not the bricks, and I can see getting it off if need be an impossible task and I object to making permanent alterations. However a thin gypsum skim onto a lime render sounds a perfect combination to me. Lime against the brick which is weak enough not to damage the brick and also if there is water ingress from outside should deal with it better than gypsum. Gypsum skim for strength against knocks, repairability and soaking up condensation if there is any. I haven't tried multifinish on lime, so I don't know if it sticks. I wish I had tried it in my experimenting room. Breathable paint would be a must though. What do people think?