masochists-r-us
Member
- Messages
- 262
- Location
- Northamptonshire
The walls of our 2 storey 17th C farmhouse were raised in victorian times and the thatched roof was replaced with a slate one. This was due to the farmer,his wife and two servants being replaced by two families, their lodgers and many children (in all 16 occupants) and so the attic space was required to be put to good use. Later in the 60's, the house was still split into two, but families were smaller and there was the holy grail of the 7 foot 6 inch ceiling height so the original spine beams and joists were removed and replaced with a modern ceiling not strong enough to support the bedrooms and en suite bathroom we want to put up there now.
So, we have re-installed oak spine beams which are bigger than the originals would have been to comply with current building regs.
Having got used to 7'6" ceiling height,the 6'3" minimum which is the underside of the 10" wide spine beam (6'9" to the underside of the joists) feels a bit on the low side and whilst we could raise it further, this will only reduce the headroom in the attic space and scupper our plans so not an attractive option.
I'm sure 6'3" won't be the lowest headroom out there, but I'm interested in objective views as to whether we have cut it too fine or not.
All views appreciated.
So, we have re-installed oak spine beams which are bigger than the originals would have been to comply with current building regs.
Having got used to 7'6" ceiling height,the 6'3" minimum which is the underside of the 10" wide spine beam (6'9" to the underside of the joists) feels a bit on the low side and whilst we could raise it further, this will only reduce the headroom in the attic space and scupper our plans so not an attractive option.
I'm sure 6'3" won't be the lowest headroom out there, but I'm interested in objective views as to whether we have cut it too fine or not.
All views appreciated.