Flyfisher
Member
- Messages
- 10,202
- Location
- Norfolk, UK
In a previous thread there was some discussion about failure mechanisms when using lime hydrate in mortar mixes. I mentioned that I'd had some lime mortar fail over winter, even though the work had been done in the summer so it definitely wasn't a frost-while-setting problems. It was also alongside similar lime mortar that didn't fail.
Two possibilitie were offered:
1. The original work was not covered and kept damp, so the mortar could have dried too quickly thus hindering proper carbonation as this is facilitated by C02 dissolved in water
2. The lime hydrate might have gone 'stale', i.e. already partially carbonated through exposure to air, which is why lime putty is more desirable as it keeps indefinitely.
Thinking about this while re-laying a path yesterday confused me somewhat (my fault for thinking!). If lime mortar requires to be kept damp in order to thoroughly carbonate to full strength, i.e. the water facilitates setting, why can putty be kept indefinitely under water?
Two possibilitie were offered:
1. The original work was not covered and kept damp, so the mortar could have dried too quickly thus hindering proper carbonation as this is facilitated by C02 dissolved in water
2. The lime hydrate might have gone 'stale', i.e. already partially carbonated through exposure to air, which is why lime putty is more desirable as it keeps indefinitely.
Thinking about this while re-laying a path yesterday confused me somewhat (my fault for thinking!). If lime mortar requires to be kept damp in order to thoroughly carbonate to full strength, i.e. the water facilitates setting, why can putty be kept indefinitely under water?