Pennyviz said:Where are you in country?
Me! said:.......Has you beam been re-used having been turned through 90 degrees?
Andys said:Aren't those rather industrially-sized mortices to be so close together, could this be a wall plate from a close-studded building but reused after rotating by 90 degrees? Surely the timbers associated with those mortices would be pretty substantial?
Also has the beam been rather roughly thinned on one side, there seem to be the vestiges of some of the rectangular mortices? And surely your diamond-shaped wine-bottle holders would run along the top of a window holding some jumbo-sized mullions wouldn't they?
Has this been nicked from a much more grand building?
Andys said:The V shaped slot between the three mortices looks like a big version of the slots we have here which were intended to take the staves of wattle panels. Everything seems to be about twice the size of ours.
Andys said:So the great big mortices at one side are matched by fairly small grooves the other - like fixings for giant wattle staves maybe. Or perhaps the ground floor timbers were chunky and the upper floor ones flimsier...?
The V shaped slot between the three mortices looks like a big version of the slots we have here which were intended to take the staves of wattle panels.
I don't understand the irregular notches taken out of the corner edge of the beam, diagonally fitted posts like rafters mebbe? All looks a bit insecure...
livias said:Smoke blackened which says pre 1550ish
I looked closely for apotropaic marks which if any I would expect to see above the mullion but cant see any. Maybe some in the last picture?
There seem to be lines/steps which go right across the beam (from top to bottom as it is now) which I don't understand
Shadows from laths and nails which went from the beam in one direction only. Up!. So I expect the timber was vertical at one time and the laths were horizontal
hmmm ...
MikeG said:livias said:Smoke blackened which says pre 1550ish
That's what I was after. It says even more than that, though. Because it is a wall plate, it means that this comes originally from a hall house/ open Essex farmhouse. As we've seen from the size of the timbers, it was a substantial high-status building. I've got jointing evidence (scarfs) from elsewhere in the house that dates the timbers to 1250 to 1400, so they were potentially ancient timbers when they were hauled to this site in 1695 to 1710 to build a farmworker's cottage. I'd love to know what it looked like, because windows up to the wall plate of a hall house has me just a little puzzled.
Fascinating stuff Mike. The Cruck blades in my house from 1330 are about 10" square and the infill beams dated to 1527 are 15", yet it is probably still a 'peasant's ' house! What is the jointing/scarf evidence - I thought it was only tree ring dating or vernacular structure? Could you provide a link if you have it to hand I'd be really interested.
Penny