tumbledown
Member
- Messages
- 95
- Location
- Suffolk
Hi, I'm new to this forum and to period properties in general - so please go easy on me if I say something stupid or blindingly obvious!
We have just bought a grade two timber framed building which has been neglected somewhat over the last 40 or 50 years. It has cement floors, high external ground levels and cement renders both internal and external. Maybe you won't be surprised to hear we have a spot of damp in the walls and soleplate!
We are concidering lowering the ground levels outside (except for one wall as its impossible unless we dig up the pavement) and removing the concrete floors. We would like to lay flagstones or floor bricks without a Damp proof course, allowing the floor to breath. My one concern is that a builder (who says he knows about historic buildings) told us that the only problem with this is that matts and the bottom of furniture will grow mold as they will stop the passage of moisture. He said that floor areas under large furniture such as dressers would always be musty. I wonder if anyone has any experience of this or is it simply not true?
The other course of action we concidered is to simply batton the concrete floor and lay oak flooring. Although there are signs of damp in the walls, there is no evidence of any in the floors. Once again, we received mixed opinions on this one. a few people have suggested that oak flooring may not be appropriate for this type of building due to the high moisture levels. Also, it has been suggested that as the concrete floor doesn't look to have been laid very well, the DPC may not be totally effective and that floorboards would warp if any moisture is let through. do you think oak flooring is a good idea or not? Or should we stick to some form of hard flooring?
We have been advised that if we want wooden floors, we should take up the existing concrete floor and lay other one with a good DPC. It seems to us that if we are going to go to the trouble of lifting the floor we might as well go down the breathable route. As I said earlier we are looking at lowering the ground levels outside, but I'm not sure we can afford to remove all the cement and replace it with lime plaster - not at this time anyway. At least the timber frame is exposed outside and in and are not covered with cement - only the infills have cement renders.
We would appreciate peoples opinions on the various opions open to us.
We have just bought a grade two timber framed building which has been neglected somewhat over the last 40 or 50 years. It has cement floors, high external ground levels and cement renders both internal and external. Maybe you won't be surprised to hear we have a spot of damp in the walls and soleplate!
We are concidering lowering the ground levels outside (except for one wall as its impossible unless we dig up the pavement) and removing the concrete floors. We would like to lay flagstones or floor bricks without a Damp proof course, allowing the floor to breath. My one concern is that a builder (who says he knows about historic buildings) told us that the only problem with this is that matts and the bottom of furniture will grow mold as they will stop the passage of moisture. He said that floor areas under large furniture such as dressers would always be musty. I wonder if anyone has any experience of this or is it simply not true?
The other course of action we concidered is to simply batton the concrete floor and lay oak flooring. Although there are signs of damp in the walls, there is no evidence of any in the floors. Once again, we received mixed opinions on this one. a few people have suggested that oak flooring may not be appropriate for this type of building due to the high moisture levels. Also, it has been suggested that as the concrete floor doesn't look to have been laid very well, the DPC may not be totally effective and that floorboards would warp if any moisture is let through. do you think oak flooring is a good idea or not? Or should we stick to some form of hard flooring?
We have been advised that if we want wooden floors, we should take up the existing concrete floor and lay other one with a good DPC. It seems to us that if we are going to go to the trouble of lifting the floor we might as well go down the breathable route. As I said earlier we are looking at lowering the ground levels outside, but I'm not sure we can afford to remove all the cement and replace it with lime plaster - not at this time anyway. At least the timber frame is exposed outside and in and are not covered with cement - only the infills have cement renders.
We would appreciate peoples opinions on the various opions open to us.