MatthewC
Member
- Messages
- 1,733
- Location
- Central/South England
I'm sorry for raising this again - I've done a thorough search of the forum and Agony Uncle, and if anything I am even more confused.
In our proposed purchase (1830s stone built, Grade II, conservation area), the room across the back has mortared red and black Victorian tiles in a diagonal pattern, probably laid in screed direct on the ground. They do not look in fantastic condition as they have formerly been covered by something (lino? vinyl floor?) and in damp conditions the backing has attached itself to the tiles. Also, the floor is not level and there is a tile-less area where there was once a brick dividing wall for about eight feet. One other fundamental problem of the house is the ground outside which is higher than this floor by about 8 inches; I intend to lower the outside ground level as much as possible, being mindful of how deep the foundations might be (or not), but the ground generally is high-ish at the back of the house.
'Er indoors has just decided that we should use this room as the kitchen so the plan is to install a breathable new floor; it seems sensible to increase the height of the floor by about 6 inches (which gives a step up at the door), fit insulation and even possibly underfloor heating, with similar tiles re-instated.
I shall be engaging an architect and I've already spoken to a conservation officer but I'd like to know a few basics myself so that I can discuss sensibly with them. My initial plan for the floor was to use limecrete with LECA, but now I'm not so sure.
NB Considering the poor state of the roof and the rising ground, the house is surprisingly dry, so I reckon that fixing the roof and the ground will fix the major damp issues.
In our proposed purchase (1830s stone built, Grade II, conservation area), the room across the back has mortared red and black Victorian tiles in a diagonal pattern, probably laid in screed direct on the ground. They do not look in fantastic condition as they have formerly been covered by something (lino? vinyl floor?) and in damp conditions the backing has attached itself to the tiles. Also, the floor is not level and there is a tile-less area where there was once a brick dividing wall for about eight feet. One other fundamental problem of the house is the ground outside which is higher than this floor by about 8 inches; I intend to lower the outside ground level as much as possible, being mindful of how deep the foundations might be (or not), but the ground generally is high-ish at the back of the house.
'Er indoors has just decided that we should use this room as the kitchen so the plan is to install a breathable new floor; it seems sensible to increase the height of the floor by about 6 inches (which gives a step up at the door), fit insulation and even possibly underfloor heating, with similar tiles re-instated.
I shall be engaging an architect and I've already spoken to a conservation officer but I'd like to know a few basics myself so that I can discuss sensibly with them. My initial plan for the floor was to use limecrete with LECA, but now I'm not so sure.
- Why do people imply that limecrete is very expensive? I can see it is not as cheap as concrete but it seems a price worth paying.
Various specialists say that limecrete is warmer to the touch than concrete - is this true?
If so, is underfloor heating really needed if the room has a wood burner?
What are the relative merits of LECA versus Recycled Foamed Glass insulation?
The Limecrete Company also do "Hemcrete". Has anyone used this and what are its merits (including cost) versus limecrete?
What are the current/new building regulations regarding replacing a floor in a listed building?
NB Considering the poor state of the roof and the rising ground, the house is surprisingly dry, so I reckon that fixing the roof and the ground will fix the major damp issues.