Feltwell Member Messages 6,377 Location Shropshire, England May 22, 2012 #1 Then just change it! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18168278 Bit pricey though.
S Sandsni Member Messages 15 May 22, 2012 #2 Totally bonkers, but I love the idea of it. It's got me wondering where I'd like to move my house to if money was no object. West coast of Ireland, Africa, Bahamas? :wink:
Totally bonkers, but I love the idea of it. It's got me wondering where I'd like to move my house to if money was no object. West coast of Ireland, Africa, Bahamas? :wink:
P Penners Member Messages 17,294 Location Suffolk, England May 23, 2012 #3 No... ...bored WITH... :evil: P. Edant.
Feltwell Member Messages 6,377 Location Shropshire, England May 23, 2012 #4 :roll: As in "Bored of the Rings" - a delight for Tolkien fans everywhere. :wink:
M Moo Member Messages 3,958 Location SE 22 May 24, 2012 #5 Penners said: No... ...bored WITH... :evil: P. Edant. Click to expand... Oh, thank you so much for saying that, Mr Edant.
Penners said: No... ...bored WITH... :evil: P. Edant. Click to expand... Oh, thank you so much for saying that, Mr Edant.
F Flyfisher Member Messages 10,178 Location Norfolk, UK May 24, 2012 #6 "bored of . . . " and similar constructs seem to be commonly used these days. I wonder how long it takes for such things to become normalised (now there's a horrible word!) into language grammar?
"bored of . . . " and similar constructs seem to be commonly used these days. I wonder how long it takes for such things to become normalised (now there's a horrible word!) into language grammar?
P Penners Member Messages 17,294 Location Suffolk, England May 24, 2012 #7 In the Penners house, 1000 years! Mind you, "bored of" is a mere gnat-bite compared with... I can hardly bring myself to type it... "should of". That was physically painful. :evil:
In the Penners house, 1000 years! Mind you, "bored of" is a mere gnat-bite compared with... I can hardly bring myself to type it... "should of". That was physically painful. :evil:
Feltwell Member Messages 6,377 Location Shropshire, England May 24, 2012 #8 Just for Penners:- http://languagerules.wordpress.com/2006/12/06/could-of-should-of-would-of/
P Penners Member Messages 17,294 Location Suffolk, England May 25, 2012 #9 That's the biggest load of old doo-dah! Correct? I don't think so! It's easy to check whether a construction like that is correct. Simply remove the word "should". Does it still make sense? "I should have gone shopping" becomes "I have gone shopping". A perfectly correct construction. "I should of gone shopping" becomes "I of gone shopping". Clearly nonsense.
That's the biggest load of old doo-dah! Correct? I don't think so! It's easy to check whether a construction like that is correct. Simply remove the word "should". Does it still make sense? "I should have gone shopping" becomes "I have gone shopping". A perfectly correct construction. "I should of gone shopping" becomes "I of gone shopping". Clearly nonsense.