realslyshady
Member
- Messages
- 11
Hi folks! Looking for a little advice, if anyone has the time to give it.
We renovated and have been living in an 1850s terraced railway worker's house for years, so we've seen a little of the issues involved with older properties. We've just sold it and moved to a 5-bed, 3-storey semi-detached 1880 townhouse in need of total renovation. It's in a real state. The air bricks are clogged with tarmac, the gable has been cement pebbledashed, the rear elevation needs the cement picking out and repointing in lime. The offset kitchen has a cement slab floor and the rainwater goods are completely gubbed. Two external stone lintels and one internal wooden lintel are wrecked and need replacing. The property has been occupied by one person for about 40 years, and only one room ever heated in all that time. It has also suffered with significant subsidence over the years (the attached property has been underpinned) though that seems to have stopped. Nearly all the plaster has blown. Fair to say it has the odd issue with damp, and needs a huge amount of work.
We're not trying to restore it completely, more of a renovation. We've made an open plan ground floor, and we're having central heating installed. Some of the ground floor joists are shot, about a third of them need to be replaced or reset, and half the floorboards need to be replaced. Our builder feels that laying a new floor would be easier, cheaper and more secure, and that's led us to consider investing in underfloor heating. While I see a lot to commend the idea, I'm also wary of doing anything that's going to cause problems along the line. With that in mind, I was wondering if anyone here has had underfloor heating installed in place of suspended timber floors, and if so — any advice? Any regrets? Any warnings? We're working on a budget, trying to balance what the property needs to get dry with making a longterm family home.
Would appreciate any advice or suggestions. Thank you!
We renovated and have been living in an 1850s terraced railway worker's house for years, so we've seen a little of the issues involved with older properties. We've just sold it and moved to a 5-bed, 3-storey semi-detached 1880 townhouse in need of total renovation. It's in a real state. The air bricks are clogged with tarmac, the gable has been cement pebbledashed, the rear elevation needs the cement picking out and repointing in lime. The offset kitchen has a cement slab floor and the rainwater goods are completely gubbed. Two external stone lintels and one internal wooden lintel are wrecked and need replacing. The property has been occupied by one person for about 40 years, and only one room ever heated in all that time. It has also suffered with significant subsidence over the years (the attached property has been underpinned) though that seems to have stopped. Nearly all the plaster has blown. Fair to say it has the odd issue with damp, and needs a huge amount of work.
We're not trying to restore it completely, more of a renovation. We've made an open plan ground floor, and we're having central heating installed. Some of the ground floor joists are shot, about a third of them need to be replaced or reset, and half the floorboards need to be replaced. Our builder feels that laying a new floor would be easier, cheaper and more secure, and that's led us to consider investing in underfloor heating. While I see a lot to commend the idea, I'm also wary of doing anything that's going to cause problems along the line. With that in mind, I was wondering if anyone here has had underfloor heating installed in place of suspended timber floors, and if so — any advice? Any regrets? Any warnings? We're working on a budget, trying to balance what the property needs to get dry with making a longterm family home.
Would appreciate any advice or suggestions. Thank you!