tom.harrigan
Member
- Messages
- 96
I'm curious to know about building techniques employed when people could not afford lime. I live in a simple ironstone cottage in north Oxfordshire that doesn't have any lime in its original construction as far as I can tell. Even the cellar (which I discovered last year), with its vaulted ceiling, uses no lime. The mortar (for want of a better word) which in the cellar is very thin, but in the rest of the house can be quite thick, consists of nothing more than the local "mud". The mud when damp - thank heavens my cellar is damp!- is quite sticky. When dry, it just turns to dust and has a tendency to fall away. Thankfully the walls are quite thick, ranging from 20" to 27". On the walls which seem most undisturbed, you find internally exceedingly poor quality stonework, consisting of thin random pieces of stone with very thick mud jointing. Over that there is a mud and straw daub, and over the daub some generations of lime plaster.
It appears that externally lime pointing was employed, however the lime was not structural. It seems to me that lime may have been a relatively expensive material (some things never change), only to be used in the finest houses or where absolutely necessary.
T
It appears that externally lime pointing was employed, however the lime was not structural. It seems to me that lime may have been a relatively expensive material (some things never change), only to be used in the finest houses or where absolutely necessary.
T