Even in the highly unlikely event that you actually wanted to.Flyfisher said:My first thought on reading the title of this thread was that there's not enough of her to get a pinch of anything . . . .
hahahahahha :lol: :lol:Flyfisher said:My first thought on reading the title of this thread was that there's not enough of her to get a pinch of anything . . . .
Assuming that was meant to be a question, the answer is: me.ilona73 said:who doesn't find tough love deeply, deeply erotic!
Penners said:Assuming that was meant to be a question, the answer is: me.ilona73 said:who doesn't find tough love deeply, deeply erotic!
Do you know the derivation of the word "posh"?
In case you don't, it derives from the regular sailings of passenger liners to India, during the time of the Raj. The very best cabins were the ones that didn't get too heated up by the tropical sun. These were very expensive and could only be afforded by the wealthiest travellers.
The cabins were located on the shadowy side of the ship - Port Out, Starboard Home.
Are you actually telling me that, in a disagreement between me and Dictionary.com, you would accept their argument over mine?FamilyWiggs said:Dictionary.com has this:
"posh
1918, of uncertain origin; no evidence for the common derivation from an acronym of port outward, starboard home, supposedly the shipboard accommodations of wealthy British traveling to India on the P & O Lines (to keep their cabins out of the sun); see objections outlined in G. Chowdharay-Best, "Mariner's Mirror," Jan. 1971. More likely from slang posh "a dandy" (1890), from thieves' slang meaning "money" (1830), originally "coin of small value, halfpenny," possibly from Romany posh "half.""
What a shame - I'd understood the P&O derivation to be correct. Another nice story exposed as fallacy!
Well, I'll overlook it just this once. Just make sure that there isn't a second offence.FamilyWiggs said:Penners - I'm not sure what came over me. I just assumed that t'internet would be more accurate about everything.